The one record a piece of land has from the first approach to Completed or Dead; Lead and Opportunity are its two phases, not two records.
- What it holds
- Address, Site Code and Region, the landowner and an optional promoter Account (D-032), Deal Type, Construction Involved, units, planning applications, stage, status, an owner per function, the priority the regional lead sets.
- Its states
- Lead stages New Lead → … → Instructed with a pre-instruction status; Site stages Instructed → Acceptable Offer → Acceptable Build → Under Offer → Legals → Exchanged → Completed; Dead from any stage; Site status Active / Awaiting / Agreed / Parked from Instructed; Merged into a master Site.
- Personal data
- The landowner’s name and address when a private individual.
- Comes from
- LCY Site LifecycleLED LeadsLCY-C01LCY-C02LCY-C03LCY-C22LCY-C24LCY-C25
SampleChurch Farm, Rugby — CE-014, Central, 28 homes, Land & Build, at Legals, Active, Deal Health 55.
Candidate lead
Personal data
A site found by a collection run or drafted from an inbound email, waiting in the review queue; it is not a Site until Back Office accepts it (D-011).
- What it holds
- Address, site area, planning reference and status, units, owner and company details, title number where available, the source link and capture date, the contact candidates.
- Its states
- new → accepted (it becomes a Site at New Lead) / rejected / duplicate; rejected or duplicate → new with a reason; rejected as not reviewed after an age the admin sets (D-034).
- Personal data
- Applicant, agent and owner names from public planning and land data; the sender of an inbound email.
- Comes from
- LGN Lead GenerationEML Email, Calendar and TeamsLGN-C20LGN-C21LGN-C22LGN-C23LGN-C24LGN-C34EML-C18
SampleMill Road, Sindlesham RG41 — Wokingham BC 262113, Outline · Approved, 1.9 ha, collected from the Wokingham BC planning portal on 2 Oct 2026 and accepted as Hatch Farm, SW-031.
Lead source
No personal data
A registered place candidate sites are collected from: an official or licensed dataset, a council planning portal or another site.
- What it holds
- Type, address, schedule, selection criteria, its terms-of-use position, whether collection is on, the rate limit, health and performance.
- Its states
- enabled / paused (by the Admin) / failing (seen by the system, the Admin is alerted).
- Comes from
- LGN Lead GenerationLGN-C01LGN-C02LGN-C10LGN-C29LGN-C30
SampleWokingham BC planning portal — the run of Fri 2 Oct 2026, 06:10, found Hatch Farm.
Lead qualification
Personal data
What Land records about a Lead before instruction.
- What it holds
- Motivation, decision-maker identified, exclusivity potential, likelihood to instruct, the follow-up tracker.
- Its states
- open → qualified.
- Personal data
- The decision-maker’s name and notes when a private individual.
- Comes from
- LED LeadsLED-C08LED-C09LED-C24
SampleHatch Farm, 19 Oct 2026: “Retiring; wants certainty”; decision-maker Edward Marsh; exclusivity High; Likely.
Site Review record
Names a Valere user
One outcome of the team’s commercial go / no-go on a Lead; every review is kept (D-012).
- What it holds
- The outcome Go, Dead with a Reason Dead, or Pending with what is missing, its owner and date; the checklist findings it was held on.
- Its states
- kept: each review is a new record, none is overwritten.
- Personal data
- The owner, as a user.
- Comes from
- LCY Site LifecycleLCY-C08LCY-C09LCY-C10
SampleHatch Farm, Mon 2 Nov 2026: Go — the title plan still to come from Edward Marsh.
Instruction Approval item
Names a Valere user
One check of the final gate before a formal instruction.
- What it holds
- The item, its evidence (a SharePoint link or a note), the reviewer and the date — or a partner’s named exception with its reason.
- Its states
- open → complete / excepted.
- Personal data
- The reviewer and the approver, as users.
- Comes from
- LCY Site LifecycleLCY-C11LCY-C12LCY-C13LCY-C15
SampleHatch Farm: “LPA planning portal comments checked” excepted by Rhys Calloway on Tue 10 Nov 2026 — the highways comments were not yet published.
Stage move
Names a Valere user
One change of a Site’s stage: the unit of its stage history (D-021).
- What it holds
- From, to, the user, the time, the days in the stage, and the reason where one is required (a move back).
- Its states
- immutable.
- Personal data
- The user who moved it.
- Comes from
- LCY Site LifecycleLCY-C30LCY-C31LCY-C05
SampleOrchard Lane: Instructed → Acceptable Offer on Mon 26 Oct 2026, when Dana Whitfield chose Calder Valley Homes.
Closure record
Names a Valere user
The outcome of a closed Site: one per Site, with a dated entry for each closing (D-008, D-034).
- What it holds
- Outcome, Reason Dead, a sentence, final price and fee, the winning party where lost, lessons learned, the MD’s reason on a reopening.
- Its states
- one per Site with dated closing entries; reopened by the MD only.
- Personal data
- The closer and the MD, as users.
- Comes from
- LCY Site LifecycleLCY-C25LCY-C26LCY-C28LCY-C29
SampleMill Croft, Banbury (CE-009): Dead on Mon 28 Sep 2026, No acceptable offer — “Keep a second RP warm until the board has approved.”
Appraisal
No personal data
Valere’s financial assessment of a Site, as a Private (developer) or an HA (package) appraisal.
- What it holds
- The unit stack, revenue (£ per sq ft, GDV), costs (build cost, S106, CIL, BNG), for HA the package as % of GDV with best and worst case, the residual land value; every input with its source and confidence.
- Its states
- draft → submitted → approved, or returned with a reason (D-034); outcome Instructed / Declined / Parked / Under Review; every version kept; an internal or a client version.
- Comes from
- APR Financial AppraisalsAPR-C01APR-C02APR-C04APR-C05APR-C19APR-C42
SampleHatch Farm, HA appraisal: version 2 approved by Eleanor Shaw on Wed 28 Oct 2026 — GDV £10,876,800, residual £2,975,000; version 3 waits for her.
Site review checklist
No personal data
The checks run on an appraised Site ahead of Site Review.
- What it holds
- Hurdles, documents present and the latest, plans against the consent, NDSS, LPA comments, JR and BNG, the landowner’s expectation; each finding confirmed or dismissed by a person.
- Its states
- pending → complete; it runs again as documents arrive.
- Comes from
- APR Financial AppraisalsAPR-C29APR-C35APR-C36APR-C37
SampleHatch Farm: “Public footpath crosses the north field” confirmed; “Flood zone 2 on the eastern boundary” dismissed.
Buyer Involvement
No personal data
The link between one Site and one Buyer Account, carrying that buyer’s journey on the Site.
- What it holds
- The buyer journey stage, the buyer’s Contact, the coverage date, the deadline, quality, the next step; one may be the Preferred RP.
- Its states
- Coverage → Teaser → Pitched → Interested → Offered → Agreed → Board → Approved; Not Interested at any point, with a reason; held at Coverage until a fee agreement is recorded.
- Comes from
- BUY Buyers and OffersBUY-C01BUY-C02BUY-C03BUY-C05BUY-C23
SampleOrchard Lane × Calder Valley Homes: Offered, the Preferred RP since Mon 26 Oct 2026 — one of 15 RPs against a target of 15.
A buyer’s priced proposal for a Site, kept in every version and compared like for like.
- What it holds
- Value, structure, per-unit figure, % of GDV, grade, the unique-offer flag, conditions, date, and the Employer’s Requirements version it is priced against.
- Its states
- received → under review → accepted / declined / withdrawn; grade Exceptional / Good / Acceptable / Weak.
- Comes from
- BUY Buyers and OffersBUY-C14BUY-C15BUY-C17BUY-C18BUY-C19
SampleCalder Valley Homes on Orchard Lane, version 2 of Thu 22 Oct 2026: £10,480,000, 73.8% of GDV, Good.
Offer Pro Forma
Names a Valere user
The pre-filled record completed only for an offer graded Acceptable or better.
- What it holds
- Unit and tenure mix, package, % of GDV, Valere fee, board approvals, programme, commentary, the reviewer.
- Its states
- draft → completed.
- Personal data
- The reviewer, as a user.
- Comes from
- BUY Buyers and OffersBUY-C25
SampleCalder Valley Homes on Orchard Lane: “Strongest package; their Employer’s Requirements are already priced by two contractors.” — “Choose as Preferred RP.”
Contractor Involvement
No personal data
The link between one Site and one Contractor Account, carrying that contractor’s journey on the Site’s tender.
- What it holds
- The contractor journey stage with the date of each move, the contractor’s bids, and an outcome: Not proceeding, Declined, Unsuccessful or Withdrawn.
- Its states
- Coverage → Longlist → Tender Sent → Bids Returned → Priced → Preferred → Appointed; Not proceeding at any point, with a reason (D-032). Only on Sites with Construction Involved = Yes, after an acceptable offer.
- Comes from
- CTR Contractors and TendersCTR-C02CTR-C03CTR-C24CTR-C25
SampleOrchard Lane × Marlow & Pike Build: Preferred on Thu 12 Nov 2026, agreed build cost £7,975,000.
One Site’s call for bids; the coverage of six contractors is counted per tender (D-012).
- What it holds
- The tender pack, the return date, the invited Contractor Involvements, the outcome.
- Its states
- preparing → issued → bids returned → closed, with the outcome preferred chosen / no acceptable bid / re-tendered / abandoned (D-034).
- Comes from
- CTR Contractors and TendersCTR-C08CTR-C09CTR-C27CTR-C28
SampleOrchard Lane: issued Wed 28 Oct 2026, returns by Fri 6 Nov; 4 invitations against a target of 6.
A contractor’s priced tender return, kept in every version; logged by Construction only.
- What it holds
- Base price, itemised abnormals, £ per sq ft, fee % of build, grade, rank on base price, CSA status, the Employer’s Requirements version priced against.
- Its states
- returned → priced → preferred / unsuccessful / withdrawn / rejected; versions; grade Exceptional / Good / Acceptable / Unviable; CSA none / attached / acceptable (D-033, D-034).
- Comes from
- CTR Contractors and TendersCTR-C11CTR-C12CTR-C13CTR-C15CTR-C17
SampleMarlow & Pike Build on Orchard Lane: base £7,640,000 + abnormals £335,000 = £7,975,000, Good, ranked 1 of 4.
Abnormal cost claim
No personal data
A contractor’s claim for an increase over the CSA between Heads of Terms and exchange (D-010).
- What it holds
- Change type, evidence, original and revised cost, the share of the CSA, the split across parties, Valere’s decision and reason.
- Its states
- submitted → approved (in full or in part) / rejected / more information; above an admin-set value a Partner / MD decides.
- Comes from
- CTR Contractors and TendersCTR-C18CTR-C19CTR-C20
SampleWestbrook Construction on Church Farm, Wed 21 Oct 2026: unforeseen ground conditions, £74,000 — above the £50,000 that needs a partner.
Commercial decision
Names a Valere user
The record of a material change to the land, build, package or fee figures of a Site (D-010).
- What it holds
- The old and new figures, the reason, the evidence, the date, the approver.
- Its states
- immutable.
- Personal data
- The approver, as a user.
- Comes from
- CTR Contractors and TendersCTR-C21CTR-C22
SampleChurch Farm: build cost £6,320,000 → £6,394,000 after the approved ground claim.
Quote comparison
No personal data
One returned quote read into NRM headings and set against the Benchmark, the Employer’s Requirements and earlier quotes.
- What it holds
- The source document, the extracted lines with their confidence, base price and abnormals, differences in £ and %, the rate per sq ft, the flags, the reviewer’s notes and decision.
- Its states
- uploaded → extracted → reviewed → saved; void with a reason, kept and left out of the benchmark (D-034).
- Comes from
- BCB Build Cost BenchmarkingBCB-C01BCB-C02BCB-C03BCB-C16BCB-C29BCB-C39
SampleMarlow & Pike Build’s return for Orchard Lane: read, waiting for Conor Higgins’s review on Mon 9 Nov 2026, 3 flags.
Benchmark
No personal data
Valere’s expected build cost by NRM heading, region, unit type and size — one for the company, not per Site.
- What it holds
- Figures built from historic CSAs and BCIS, each showing where it came from; Valere’s standard specification beside them.
- Its states
- current; rebuilt as CSAs are loaded or comparisons saved.
- Comes from
- BCB Build Cost BenchmarkingBCB-C05BCB-C09BCB-C10BCB-C11BCB-C38
SampleQ3 2026 rates: Substructure £610,000 against BCIS £590,000 for Orchard Lane’s 46,800 sq ft.
Pre-quote estimate
No personal data
The early build estimate before any quote arrives, approved by Construction.
- What it holds
- Base build cost, abnormals estimated apart, assumptions, evidence, rate dates, confidence.
- Its states
- draft → approved; every version kept.
- Comes from
- BCB Build Cost BenchmarkingBCB-C24BCB-C25BCB-C26BCB-C37
SampleHatch Farm: £4,950,000 (£187.5 per sq ft), approved by Conor Higgins on Fri 30 Oct 2026.
Planning cost requirement
No personal data
A cost item a consent or a technical report requires, used to flag an allowance a quote is missing.
- What it holds
- The item, its source document and page, the confidence, the cost heading, the reviewer.
- Its states
- proposed → confirmed / dismissed; only confirmed ones flag a quote.
- Comes from
- BCB Build Cost BenchmarkingBCB-C19BCB-C20BCB-C23
SampleSection 278 highway works, drainage, ground conditions, ecology and BNG — the kind of item a confirmed requirement checks each of Orchard Lane’s quotes for.
Heads of Terms
No personal data
The agreed commercial terms between the parties before legals: one record per HoTs type, linked back-to-back (D-007).
- What it holds
- Type (Land / Land and Build / Construction), package, land and build values, fees, overage, conditions, the exclusivity date; every revision; the generated agreement.
- Its states
- draft → issued (sent for signature) → signed; withdrawn with a reason (D-034); a revision after signing is a new revision.
- Comes from
- HOT Heads of Terms and ExclusivityHOT-C01HOT-C03HOT-C04HOT-C05HOT-C08HOT-C10
SampleChurch Farm, Land and Build HoTs: land £3,640,000, build £6,320,000, package £9,960,000 (74.2% of GDV), signed on Mon 5 Oct 2026.
Valere’s income on a Site, one record per fee stream, all under the Site’s one fee agreement (D-029).
- What it holds
- The stream (agency, overage, contractor introduction, design / Reserved Matters), amount, basis, trigger, owner, the invoiced and collected marks.
- Its states
- basis agreed / contingent / speculative; not triggered → triggered → invoiced → collected (marked by hand), or not payable with a reason and a Partner / MD approver (D-034).
- Comes from
- HOT Heads of Terms and ExclusivityHOT-C12HOT-C14HOT-C17HOT-C19HOT-C34
SampleChurch Farm: agency £130,000 at exchange, overage £20,000, contractor introduction £72,000 at JCT signing, design £40,000 — £262,000 in all.
Exclusivity
No personal data
The period in which the landowner deals only with Valere.
- What it holds
- The agreement chosen from Valere’s set, milestones, extensions, the end date, a reminder 14 days before it.
- Its states
- pending signature → active → extended → ended; withdrawn (D-034).
- Comes from
- HOT Heads of Terms and ExclusivityHOT-C22HOT-C25HOT-C26HOT-C27
SampleChurch Farm: Standard letter, back-to-back, Mon 5 Oct to Mon 23 Nov 2026; an extension to Fri 18 Dec drafted on Mon 9 Nov.
Legal milestone and enquiry
No personal data
A dated step or a question on a Site in legals; the critical dates are the board dates, exchange, completion and longstop.
- What it holds
- Who is responsible, who has it now, the date passed, days since, the deadline, whether it is on the critical path, notes.
- Its states
- open → in progress → blocked (a named blocker) → closed; Not applicable with a reason (D-034).
- Comes from
- LEG Legals and CompletionLEG-C02LEG-C04LEG-C05LEG-C06LEG-C09LEG-C41
SampleChurch Farm: “Land contract draft” with Hadley & Finch LLP for 21 days, 14 days late, on the critical path.
Legal document
No personal data
One legal or technical document of a deal in the tracker: land contract, transfer, JCT, Report on Title, CSA, warranty…
- What it holds
- Who is responsible, who has it now, the date passed, days with them, the deadline, the critical path, the status, the evidence link.
- Its states
- requested → draft → agreed → executed; Not applicable with a reason; blocked (D-034).
- Comes from
- LEG Legals and CompletionLEG-C11LEG-C12LEG-C13
SampleChurch Farm: the JCT contract with Westbrook Construction since Wed 28 Oct 2026, a draft, its amendments 2 days late.
Due diligence item
No personal data
One requirement of the due diligence checklist.
- What it holds
- The requirement, the responsibility, the evidence, Yes / No / N/A, the date, notes; linked to the matching document.
- Its states
- Yes / No / N/A, with the date.
- Comes from
- LEG Legals and CompletionLEG-C14LEG-C15
SampleChurch Farm’s checklist: planning consent, JR expiry or indemnity, Report on Title, CSA approval, warranty provider, letters of reliance.
Change, abnormal and risk
No personal data
An entry of the Site’s log — a change, an abnormal or a risk; the Risk Register is a view of these entries.
- What it holds
- Description, cost, the party carrying it, status, source document; for a risk, severity, owner, mitigation and a review-by date.
- Its states
- proposed (by the AI) → open → closed; a proposed risk is added only when the PM approves it.
- Comes from
- LEG Legals and CompletionLEG-C16LEG-C17LEG-C18LEG-C19LEG-C20
SampleChurch Farm: the approved £74,000 ground claim in the log; build cost 1.2% over the HoTs.
Schedule of accommodation
No personal data
The unit rows of a Site — also the appraisal’s unit stack, handed to Legals at Under Offer (D-033).
- What it holds
- Unit type, tenure, GIA, NIA, beds, storeys, values, an NDSS pass or fail per unit type.
- Its states
- current; versions kept.
- Comes from
- LEG Legals and CompletionAPR Financial AppraisalsLEG-C25LEG-C26APR-C07
SampleOrchard Lane’s schedule of accommodation went out with the pitch to the RPs on Wed 30 Sep 2026.
S106 and planning record
No personal data
The Site’s planning position in legals.
- What it holds
- Consent type, decision date, JR expiry or indemnity, the BNG requirement and how it is delivered.
- Its states
- current; versions kept.
- Comes from
- LEG Legals and CompletionLEG-C27
SampleChurch Farm: the S106 variation is blocked at the council — a critical item on the Legals view.